https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332266 The High Court upheld a previous judgment declaring Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 as unconstitutional due to violations of Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the validity of the rule, as it had already been conclusively decided in previous cases and the Additional Solicitor General failed to provide new arguments. Consequently, the impugned notices issued under Rule 8(3A) were set aside. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Sep 2016 18:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332266 The High Court upheld a previous judgment declaring Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 as unconstitutional due to violations of Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the validity of the rule, as it had already been conclusively decided in previous cases and the Additional Solicitor General failed to provide new arguments. Consequently, the impugned notices issued under Rule 8(3A) were set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332266