<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1120 - ITAT VIZAG</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the eligibility of the assessee for exemption u/s 10AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), emphasizing consistency and the burden on the Assessing Officer to justify a different interpretation. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, concluding that the order allowing the deduction was legally sound and consistent with past decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:59:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1120 - ITAT VIZAG</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the eligibility of the assessee for exemption u/s 10AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), emphasizing consistency and the burden on the Assessing Officer to justify a different interpretation. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, concluding that the order allowing the deduction was legally sound and consistent with past decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>