https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332265 The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against conviction under Sections 22 and 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The appellant, a Customs House Clearing Agent, was found guilty of involvement in importing Heroin, despite claiming lack of responsibility and attributing it to a non-existent company. The High Court affirmed the guilt based on evidence of brown powder identified as Heroin in the consignment and inconsistencies in the appellant's statements. The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts' decisions, leading to the dismissal of the appeal, even though the appellant had completed the sentence by then. en-us Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332265 The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against conviction under Sections 22 and 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The appellant, a Customs House Clearing Agent, was found guilty of involvement in importing Heroin, despite claiming lack of responsibility and attributing it to a non-existent company. The High Court affirmed the guilt based on evidence of brown powder identified as Heroin in the consignment and inconsistencies in the appellant's statements. The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts' decisions, leading to the dismissal of the appeal, even though the appellant had completed the sentence by then. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332265