https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332262 The court directed the Rewards Committee to reconsider the petitioner's application for the final reward, emphasizing that the reward should be determined based on the specifics of the Reward Scheme and the actual recovery made. The committee was instructed to provide a reasoned decision, considering all relevant factors. The court highlighted that the Reward Scheme is discretionary and not a statutory obligation, thus rejecting the issuance of a writ of mandamus to enforce the reward. The petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded. en-us Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332262 The court directed the Rewards Committee to reconsider the petitioner's application for the final reward, emphasizing that the reward should be determined based on the specifics of the Reward Scheme and the actual recovery made. The committee was instructed to provide a reasoned decision, considering all relevant factors. The court highlighted that the Reward Scheme is discretionary and not a statutory obligation, thus rejecting the issuance of a writ of mandamus to enforce the reward. The petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332262