<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 518 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332257</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned assessment orders, and directed the first respondent to redo the assessment in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. The court emphasized the need for the Assessing Officer to independently verify the data and records, considering all relevant factors and ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 518 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332257</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned assessment orders, and directed the first respondent to redo the assessment in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. The court emphasized the need for the Assessing Officer to independently verify the data and records, considering all relevant factors and ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>