<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1130 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186276</link>
    <description>The Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2008 was read as distinguishing a common carrier or contract carrier from a city or local natural gas distribution network. The Board could regulate transportation rates and access within the statutory scheme, but the Act did not authorise it to fix the consumer-facing retail price of gas or to compel disclosure of retail price components in bills. Section 61 could not enlarge the Board&#039;s substantive powers beyond the parent Act, and the phrase &quot;subject to the provisions of this Act&quot; in Section 22 kept tariff powers within the limits set by Section 11. Regulations travelling beyond that authority were therefore ultra vires and invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1130 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186276</link>
      <description>The Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2008 was read as distinguishing a common carrier or contract carrier from a city or local natural gas distribution network. The Board could regulate transportation rates and access within the statutory scheme, but the Act did not authorise it to fix the consumer-facing retail price of gas or to compel disclosure of retail price components in bills. Section 61 could not enlarge the Board&#039;s substantive powers beyond the parent Act, and the phrase &quot;subject to the provisions of this Act&quot; in Section 22 kept tariff powers within the limits set by Section 11. Regulations travelling beyond that authority were therefore ultra vires and invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>