<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1193 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186274</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance under section 40(a)(ii) for the assessment year 2005-06. Relying on legal precedents and finding no deliberate attempt to conceal income, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty, in line with the decision in the case of M/s. Lucky Star International.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:23:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1193 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186274</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance under section 40(a)(ii) for the assessment year 2005-06. Relying on legal precedents and finding no deliberate attempt to conceal income, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty, in line with the decision in the case of M/s. Lucky Star International.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>