<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 911 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186268</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India dismissed the Special Leave Petition without providing reasons for entertaining it, while condoning the delay. Key figures involved were Mr. Anil R. Dave, Mr. Kurian Joseph, and Mr. R.K. Agrawal. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Romy Chacko, Adv.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:13:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 911 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186268</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India dismissed the Special Leave Petition without providing reasons for entertaining it, while condoning the delay. Key figures involved were Mr. Anil R. Dave, Mr. Kurian Joseph, and Mr. R.K. Agrawal. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Romy Chacko, Adv.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>