<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1114 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186271</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s adoption of the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) over the Cost Plus Method (CPM) or Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method due to lack of reliable data. It directed the exclusion of certain companies from comparables and instructed reevaluation of related party transactions for comparability. The Tribunal addressed issues of multiple year data, TPO&#039;s power under section 133(6), and filters adopted, deeming them academic. It directed consideration of foreign exchange fluctuations and risk adjustments in computing the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) and allowed the appeal partly for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:13:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1114 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186271</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s adoption of the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) over the Cost Plus Method (CPM) or Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method due to lack of reliable data. It directed the exclusion of certain companies from comparables and instructed reevaluation of related party transactions for comparability. The Tribunal addressed issues of multiple year data, TPO&#039;s power under section 133(6), and filters adopted, deeming them academic. It directed consideration of foreign exchange fluctuations and risk adjustments in computing the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) and allowed the appeal partly for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>