https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186262 The Supreme Court affirmed that Rules 121 and 122-A of the M.P. Rules were not ultra vires the Advocates Act and did not exhibit excessive delegation. It recognized the implied power of State Bar Councils to remove office bearers through 'no confidence motions' under Section 15(1) of the Advocates Act. The Court upheld the validity of the rules, emphasizing that prior approval from the Bar Council of India was obtained as required by law, and the absence of a notification did not render the rules invalid. The appeals were dismissed. en-us Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Aug 2023 09:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186262 The Supreme Court affirmed that Rules 121 and 122-A of the M.P. Rules were not ultra vires the Advocates Act and did not exhibit excessive delegation. It recognized the implied power of State Bar Councils to remove office bearers through 'no confidence motions' under Section 15(1) of the Advocates Act. The Court upheld the validity of the rules, emphasizing that prior approval from the Bar Council of India was obtained as required by law, and the absence of a notification did not render the rules invalid. The appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186262