<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 499 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the additions of Rs. 16,00,000 and Rs. 5,49,000 made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately explained the sources of the credits, emphasizing that the lower authorities&#039; conclusions were factually and legally unsustainable. The decision was rendered on 02/08/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 11:26:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 499 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the additions of Rs. 16,00,000 and Rs. 5,49,000 made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately explained the sources of the credits, emphasizing that the lower authorities&#039; conclusions were factually and legally unsustainable. The decision was rendered on 02/08/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>