<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (3) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5009</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the appellant. The Court determined that the loss claimed as a bad debt was a revenue loss, not a capital loss, and therefore deductible under the Income-tax Act. The appellant was successful in establishing that the transaction constituted a money-lending activity within the course of business, meeting the criteria for a bad debt deduction under section 10(2)(xi).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (3) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5009</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the appellant. The Court determined that the loss claimed as a bad debt was a revenue loss, not a capital loss, and therefore deductible under the Income-tax Act. The appellant was successful in establishing that the transaction constituted a money-lending activity within the course of business, meeting the criteria for a bad debt deduction under section 10(2)(xi).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>