<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (3) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5007</link>
    <description>Deductibility of additional remuneration depends on whether the expenditure was incurred on grounds of commercial expediency and laid out wholly and exclusively for business, judged from the businessman&#039;s standpoint rather than the revenue&#039;s. A fact-finding tribunal must act judicially and record reasons if it partially disallows such a claim; it cannot reduce genuine business expenditure merely because profits did not increase proportionately, or without evidentiary support. On that basis, the partial disallowance of the directors&#039; and executive officers&#039; remuneration was unsustainable, and the deduction claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (3) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5007</link>
      <description>Deductibility of additional remuneration depends on whether the expenditure was incurred on grounds of commercial expediency and laid out wholly and exclusively for business, judged from the businessman&#039;s standpoint rather than the revenue&#039;s. A fact-finding tribunal must act judicially and record reasons if it partially disallows such a claim; it cannot reduce genuine business expenditure merely because profits did not increase proportionately, or without evidentiary support. On that basis, the partial disallowance of the directors&#039; and executive officers&#039; remuneration was unsustainable, and the deduction claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>