<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 455 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186257</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the special appeal, setting aside the judgments of the lower courts and quashing the orders of the Collector and the Tribunal. The appellant&#039;s writ petition was granted, restraining the respondents from realizing the differential duty. The Court emphasized that the merits of the case should have been considered, and the prolonged litigation should not have prejudiced the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 455 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186257</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the special appeal, setting aside the judgments of the lower courts and quashing the orders of the Collector and the Tribunal. The appellant&#039;s writ petition was granted, restraining the respondents from realizing the differential duty. The Court emphasized that the merits of the case should have been considered, and the prolonged litigation should not have prejudiced the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>