<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 489 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332228</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax on maintenance &amp;amp; repair of roads, remanding the matter for verification of the remaining service tax payment. It held that the main contractor&#039;s payment on behalf of the appellant should be considered as payment by the appellant. The Tribunal also ruled that the appellant is not liable to pay service tax for maintenance &amp;amp; repair of roads, directing the adjudicating authority to verify the payment of service tax for the remaining demand and issue an appropriate order after document verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 489 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332228</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax on maintenance &amp;amp; repair of roads, remanding the matter for verification of the remaining service tax payment. It held that the main contractor&#039;s payment on behalf of the appellant should be considered as payment by the appellant. The Tribunal also ruled that the appellant is not liable to pay service tax for maintenance &amp;amp; repair of roads, directing the adjudicating authority to verify the payment of service tax for the remaining demand and issue an appropriate order after document verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>