<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 488 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332227</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHANDIGARH ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the commission received for the sale and purchase of SIM Cards of BSNL was not subject to service tax under Business Auxiliary Services. The Tribunal found that since BSNL had already paid service tax on the full value of the SIM Cards, the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on the commission received. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of relevant case law, including a detailed order by the Tribunal, providing relief to the appellants by setting aside the demand, interest, and penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 21:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 488 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332227</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHANDIGARH ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the commission received for the sale and purchase of SIM Cards of BSNL was not subject to service tax under Business Auxiliary Services. The Tribunal found that since BSNL had already paid service tax on the full value of the SIM Cards, the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on the commission received. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of relevant case law, including a detailed order by the Tribunal, providing relief to the appellants by setting aside the demand, interest, and penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>