<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 483 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332222</link>
    <description>An SSI exemption notification must be construed strictly on its own terms. Branded goods manufactured for third parties were not to be counted as part of the exempt home-consumption clearances, and duty paid on those branded goods did not justify denial of Cenvat credit on inputs used in their manufacture. The earlier view in Ramesh Food Products was held inapplicable to the notification scheme, while Nebulae Health Care Ltd. supported exemption for an assessee&#039;s own eligible goods where the conditions were satisfied. The appellant was therefore entitled to exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE, and the demand, interest and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 483 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332222</link>
      <description>An SSI exemption notification must be construed strictly on its own terms. Branded goods manufactured for third parties were not to be counted as part of the exempt home-consumption clearances, and duty paid on those branded goods did not justify denial of Cenvat credit on inputs used in their manufacture. The earlier view in Ramesh Food Products was held inapplicable to the notification scheme, while Nebulae Health Care Ltd. supported exemption for an assessee&#039;s own eligible goods where the conditions were satisfied. The appellant was therefore entitled to exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE, and the demand, interest and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>