<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 482 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. However, the duty liability along with interest was confirmed, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 482 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. However, the duty liability along with interest was confirmed, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>