<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 481 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332220</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order regarding the adjustment of excess paid duty against short paid duty in provisional assessment. The Tribunal held that such adjustment was permissible under the law, citing a relevant Larger Bench decision. However, it emphasized that any further amount payable after adjustment would attract interest liability, as per established legal principles. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for the proper computation of interest liability, stressing the importance of accurately quantifying interest liability for any short payment of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:58:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 481 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332220</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order regarding the adjustment of excess paid duty against short paid duty in provisional assessment. The Tribunal held that such adjustment was permissible under the law, citing a relevant Larger Bench decision. However, it emphasized that any further amount payable after adjustment would attract interest liability, as per established legal principles. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for the proper computation of interest liability, stressing the importance of accurately quantifying interest liability for any short payment of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>