https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332219 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, directing the assessee to pay the entire demand proposed in the Show Cause Notice due to discrepancies in quantifying duty demands. The assessee's challenge against the demand confirmation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act was successful, with the Tribunal setting aside the confirmed demand. The Tribunal affirmed the compliance of duty payment through the Cenvat account as per Rule 8(3A) and reduced the penalty imposed under Rule 25 to &8377; 5,000, disposing of the appeals accordingly. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:58:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332219 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, directing the assessee to pay the entire demand proposed in the Show Cause Notice due to discrepancies in quantifying duty demands. The assessee's challenge against the demand confirmation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act was successful, with the Tribunal setting aside the confirmed demand. The Tribunal affirmed the compliance of duty payment through the Cenvat account as per Rule 8(3A) and reduced the penalty imposed under Rule 25 to &8377; 5,000, disposing of the appeals accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332219