<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (3) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5004</link>
    <description>Service of a reassessment notice under section 34 is a jurisdictional condition precedent, and reassessment cannot validly commence without proper service. Substituted service by affixation is effective where the serving officer, after due and reasonable diligence, cannot find the assessee and the procedure incorporated from the Code of Civil Procedure is followed. On the facts, personal attempts, enquiries as to whereabouts, affixation at the business premises in the presence of witnesses, and verification before the Income-tax Officer satisfied the statutory requirements, so the notice was duly served and the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (3) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5004</link>
      <description>Service of a reassessment notice under section 34 is a jurisdictional condition precedent, and reassessment cannot validly commence without proper service. Substituted service by affixation is effective where the serving officer, after due and reasonable diligence, cannot find the assessee and the procedure incorporated from the Code of Civil Procedure is followed. On the facts, personal attempts, enquiries as to whereabouts, affixation at the business premises in the presence of witnesses, and verification before the Income-tax Officer satisfied the statutory requirements, so the notice was duly served and the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>