<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 477 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332216</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the inclusion of third party test charges in the assessable value of Electrical Transformers. The Tribunal upheld the remand order by the Commissioner (Appeals) for detailed verification of facts by the Adjudicating authority. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a thorough examination before deciding on the includability of these charges, allowing the appeal and directing the completion of proceedings within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 21:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 477 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332216</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the inclusion of third party test charges in the assessable value of Electrical Transformers. The Tribunal upheld the remand order by the Commissioner (Appeals) for detailed verification of facts by the Adjudicating authority. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a thorough examination before deciding on the includability of these charges, allowing the appeal and directing the completion of proceedings within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>