<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 476 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding central excise duty and cenvat credit. The appeal was rejected due to lack of merit, as the Commissioner (Appeals) had appropriately considered the evidence presented by the respondent and made a decision on the eligibility of credit based on merit. The Tribunal found no substantial grounds to overturn the Commissioner (Appeals) order, ultimately upholding the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 476 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding central excise duty and cenvat credit. The appeal was rejected due to lack of merit, as the Commissioner (Appeals) had appropriately considered the evidence presented by the respondent and made a decision on the eligibility of credit based on merit. The Tribunal found no substantial grounds to overturn the Commissioner (Appeals) order, ultimately upholding the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>