<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 473 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332212</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of security due to the breach of the timeline prescribed under the Customs House Agent Licensing Regulations. Relying on legal precedents from different High Courts, the tribunal concluded that the order was unsustainable and refrained from examining the case&#039;s merits once the time bar was established. The decision was based on the distinction between mandatory and discretionary timelines in regulations, ultimately leading to the annulment of the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 20:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 473 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332212</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of security due to the breach of the timeline prescribed under the Customs House Agent Licensing Regulations. Relying on legal precedents from different High Courts, the tribunal concluded that the order was unsustainable and refrained from examining the case&#039;s merits once the time bar was established. The decision was based on the distinction between mandatory and discretionary timelines in regulations, ultimately leading to the annulment of the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>