<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 471 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332210</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in the case involving customs valuation of exported goods, setting aside redemption fines and penalties due to the absence of fraudulent intent by the appellant. The Tribunal found that although the declared value was not sustained, there was no malafide intent on the appellant&#039;s part. Consequently, the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties were deemed unwarranted, providing relief to the appellant in the interest of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 20:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 471 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332210</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in the case involving customs valuation of exported goods, setting aside redemption fines and penalties due to the absence of fraudulent intent by the appellant. The Tribunal found that although the declared value was not sustained, there was no malafide intent on the appellant&#039;s part. Consequently, the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties were deemed unwarranted, providing relief to the appellant in the interest of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>