<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 453 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332192</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. The payments made in cash were deemed justified due to business expediency, meeting the exceptions under the provision. The decision emphasized the genuineness of transactions and the practical challenges faced by the assessee in adhering to prescribed payment methods, ultimately ruling in favor of the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 453 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332192</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. The payments made in cash were deemed justified due to business expediency, meeting the exceptions under the provision. The decision emphasized the genuineness of transactions and the practical challenges faced by the assessee in adhering to prescribed payment methods, ultimately ruling in favor of the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>