<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 452 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that no transfer of land occurred under section 2(47) of the Act due to the cancellation of the development agreement and the continuous physical possession by the assessee. The judgment highlights the significance of factual circumstances and legal implications in assessing the taxability of property transfer transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 452 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that no transfer of land occurred under section 2(47) of the Act due to the cancellation of the development agreement and the continuous physical possession by the assessee. The judgment highlights the significance of factual circumstances and legal implications in assessing the taxability of property transfer transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>