<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 225 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the relief under section 80HHC should be based on the profit ascertained under section 115JA and not on income computed under other sections. The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee against the disallowance of deduction under section 80HHC, emphasizing the Assessing Officer&#039;s limited authority in computing book profits under section 115J. The presence of a non obstante clause in section 115JA was crucial in determining the eligibility for deduction under section 80HHC. The judgment also highlighted the tax effect and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for not meeting the criteria set by the Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 225 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the relief under section 80HHC should be based on the profit ascertained under section 115JA and not on income computed under other sections. The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee against the disallowance of deduction under section 80HHC, emphasizing the Assessing Officer&#039;s limited authority in computing book profits under section 115J. The presence of a non obstante clause in section 115JA was crucial in determining the eligibility for deduction under section 80HHC. The judgment also highlighted the tax effect and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for not meeting the criteria set by the Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>