<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 450 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332189</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue in a case involving the reduction of the General Reserve for capital computation and the inclusion of debentures issued to a society in the capital computation for surtax purposes. The Court held that only the amount transferred from profits to the general reserve should be considered for reduction, not the proposed dividend amount. Additionally, it determined that the debentures, which were redeemable at the company&#039;s option before seven years, should be included in the capital computation for surtax purposes. The Court disposed of the reference without costs, deciding against the Applicant in both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 450 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332189</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue in a case involving the reduction of the General Reserve for capital computation and the inclusion of debentures issued to a society in the capital computation for surtax purposes. The Court held that only the amount transferred from profits to the general reserve should be considered for reduction, not the proposed dividend amount. Additionally, it determined that the debentures, which were redeemable at the company&#039;s option before seven years, should be included in the capital computation for surtax purposes. The Court disposed of the reference without costs, deciding against the Applicant in both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>