<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 881 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186243</link>
    <description>The statutory permission scheme under the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act, 1998 was read as applying to private managements seeking approval to establish medical colleges, not to the State Government setting up its own Government-run medical college. Requiring the State to apply to the University for permission from itself was held inconsistent with the statutory context. The University&#039;s perspective plan under Section 64 was likewise treated as a control on external applicants, not as a binding restriction on the State in this situation, though it remained a relevant guideline for avoiding arbitrariness and promoting regional balance. The State&#039;s decision was found to be in substantial compliance with that plan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:19:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 881 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186243</link>
      <description>The statutory permission scheme under the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act, 1998 was read as applying to private managements seeking approval to establish medical colleges, not to the State Government setting up its own Government-run medical college. Requiring the State to apply to the University for permission from itself was held inconsistent with the statutory context. The University&#039;s perspective plan under Section 64 was likewise treated as a control on external applicants, not as a binding restriction on the State in this situation, though it remained a relevant guideline for avoiding arbitrariness and promoting regional balance. The State&#039;s decision was found to be in substantial compliance with that plan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>