https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186237 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to sustain the addition made by the ITO to the assessee's income, reject the Ikrarnama for the sale of agricultural land, the statement of the assessee's father, Solia Ram, and the affidavits filed by supporting parties. The Tribunal found the evidence presented by the assessee to be unreliable, citing inconsistencies and contradictions in the explanations provided. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed. en-us Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:57:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186237 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to sustain the addition made by the ITO to the assessee's income, reject the Ikrarnama for the sale of agricultural land, the statement of the assessee's father, Solia Ram, and the affidavits filed by supporting parties. The Tribunal found the evidence presented by the assessee to be unreliable, citing inconsistencies and contradictions in the explanations provided. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186237