<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 428 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332167</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in filing appeals before it, considering the genuine reasons for the delay due to the rejection of the ROM petition without proper service of the rejection order. The Tribunal found no deliberate intention to cause delay by the appellant and allowed the COD applications based on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, emphasizing that the decision had no precedential value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 428 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332167</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in filing appeals before it, considering the genuine reasons for the delay due to the rejection of the ROM petition without proper service of the rejection order. The Tribunal found no deliberate intention to cause delay by the appellant and allowed the COD applications based on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, emphasizing that the decision had no precedential value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>