<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 423 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332162</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that directions to file an appeal must be given by the Commissioner only to the same adjudicating authority, as mandated by Section 35E(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized the need for specific direction from the Commissioner to the adjudicating authority to file the appeal, aligning with interpretations from the Bombay and Delhi High Courts. The case was referred to the regular Bench for further action following this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 423 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332162</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that directions to file an appeal must be given by the Commissioner only to the same adjudicating authority, as mandated by Section 35E(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized the need for specific direction from the Commissioner to the adjudicating authority to file the appeal, aligning with interpretations from the Bombay and Delhi High Courts. The case was referred to the regular Bench for further action following this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>