<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 420 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332159</link>
    <description>Area based exemption under Notification No. 50/03-CE was available where the assessee achieved the stipulated 25% increase in production capacity through replacement of old plant and machinery. The earlier view in the assessee&#039;s favour, upheld by the High Court, treated the mode of expansion as immaterial once the capacity increase condition was satisfied. On that basis, the exemption claim was held to meet the notification&#039;s requirement, the departmental challenge failed, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2016 14:45:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 420 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332159</link>
      <description>Area based exemption under Notification No. 50/03-CE was available where the assessee achieved the stipulated 25% increase in production capacity through replacement of old plant and machinery. The earlier view in the assessee&#039;s favour, upheld by the High Court, treated the mode of expansion as immaterial once the capacity increase condition was satisfied. On that basis, the exemption claim was held to meet the notification&#039;s requirement, the departmental challenge failed, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>