<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 419 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332158</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of the respondent, allowing them to avail Cenvat credit on cutting charges. The Tribunal ruled that since cutting charges were included in the assessable value of the paper cleared from the factory gate, the respondent was entitled to claim Cenvat credit on the service tax paid for cutting charges. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the respondent&#039;s right to avail the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 419 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332158</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of the respondent, allowing them to avail Cenvat credit on cutting charges. The Tribunal ruled that since cutting charges were included in the assessable value of the paper cleared from the factory gate, the respondent was entitled to claim Cenvat credit on the service tax paid for cutting charges. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the respondent&#039;s right to avail the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>