https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332150 Restoration of appeals dismissed for non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction was allowed only where the ordered deposit had later been made, and then subject to payment of costs. Appeals in which payment remained outstanding were not restored, though liberty was given to seek restoration after compliance. Where the appellant had deposited the pre-deposit amounts for all concerned appeals, the attachment of property, continued as a coercive measure, was directed to be lifted once proof of payment of the restoration costs was produced. en-us Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 11 Sep 2016 14:43:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332150 Restoration of appeals dismissed for non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction was allowed only where the ordered deposit had later been made, and then subject to payment of costs. Appeals in which payment remained outstanding were not restored, though liberty was given to seek restoration after compliance. Where the appellant had deposited the pre-deposit amounts for all concerned appeals, the attachment of property, continued as a coercive measure, was directed to be lifted once proof of payment of the restoration costs was produced. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332150