<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 407 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332146</link>
    <description>Registration security furnished under Rule 28(8) is confined to the tax payable on the estimated turnover stated in the registration documents, and cannot be enlarged by a later best-judgment assessment. The surety bond is to be construed strictly, but it still secures the dealer&#039;s tax dues only within the contractual and statutory limit reflected in Form D. On the facts recorded, no reliable revised estimate was shown, so the surety&#039;s exposure was limited to the tax attributable to the declared turnover. Recovery against the surety was therefore sustainable only up to that limit, with the balance remaining recoverable from the dealer and other liable persons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 407 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332146</link>
      <description>Registration security furnished under Rule 28(8) is confined to the tax payable on the estimated turnover stated in the registration documents, and cannot be enlarged by a later best-judgment assessment. The surety bond is to be construed strictly, but it still secures the dealer&#039;s tax dues only within the contractual and statutory limit reflected in Form D. On the facts recorded, no reliable revised estimate was shown, so the surety&#039;s exposure was limited to the tax attributable to the declared turnover. Recovery against the surety was therefore sustainable only up to that limit, with the balance remaining recoverable from the dealer and other liable persons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>