<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 395 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332134</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed all appeals of the Revenue and allowed all appeals of the assessee, deleting the penalties levied under section 271(1)(c) for assessment years 2003-04, 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2008-09. The tribunal held that the penalties should have been levied under section 271AAA instead, as the searches were conducted after 1.4.2007, and there was no concealment of income by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2016 14:39:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 395 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332134</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed all appeals of the Revenue and allowed all appeals of the assessee, deleting the penalties levied under section 271(1)(c) for assessment years 2003-04, 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2008-09. The tribunal held that the penalties should have been levied under section 271AAA instead, as the searches were conducted after 1.4.2007, and there was no concealment of income by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>