<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 393 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remitting the matter back to the TPO/AO for a fresh determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of the royalty payment after verifying the actual rendering of services. The issues regarding the corporate tax adjustments for brought forward and carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation were acknowledged but not extensively addressed in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2016 14:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 393 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remitting the matter back to the TPO/AO for a fresh determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of the royalty payment after verifying the actual rendering of services. The issues regarding the corporate tax adjustments for brought forward and carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation were acknowledged but not extensively addressed in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>