<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 379 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332118</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and directed the deletion of penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for declaring rental income under the wrong head. The Tribunal held that the assessee had fully disclosed all particulars, and the change in the head of income did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealment of income, citing relevant case law. The penalties were deleted for both the relevant assessment year and the subsequent year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2016 14:38:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 379 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332118</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and directed the deletion of penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for declaring rental income under the wrong head. The Tribunal held that the assessee had fully disclosed all particulars, and the change in the head of income did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealment of income, citing relevant case law. The penalties were deleted for both the relevant assessment year and the subsequent year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>