<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1226 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186233</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the order of the CIT(A) and deleting the addition of Rs. 2,75,00,000 made for the disallowance of expenses claimed under Section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee had complied with tax deduction at source requirements by deducting tax on payments before the due date of filing the return, and emphasized that the disallowance was unjustified and without basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 13:41:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1226 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186233</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the order of the CIT(A) and deleting the addition of Rs. 2,75,00,000 made for the disallowance of expenses claimed under Section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee had complied with tax deduction at source requirements by deducting tax on payments before the due date of filing the return, and emphasized that the disallowance was unjustified and without basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>