<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 749 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186227</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Settlement Commission&#039;s order on fraudulent import and duty payment. The petitioner failed to justify non-appearance and the non-payment of the redemption fine, resulting in the denial of redemption benefit for confiscated mobile phones. The Court considered the quantum involved and declined to entertain the petition due to the petitioner&#039;s lack of cooperation with the Settlement Commission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 13:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 749 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186227</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Settlement Commission&#039;s order on fraudulent import and duty payment. The petitioner failed to justify non-appearance and the non-payment of the redemption fine, resulting in the denial of redemption benefit for confiscated mobile phones. The Court considered the quantum involved and declined to entertain the petition due to the petitioner&#039;s lack of cooperation with the Settlement Commission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>