https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186225 A writ petition challenging an assessment order was not entertained because the dispute hinged on factual questions about alleged non-service or fabrication of the notice for appearance, which were not suitable for writ adjudication. An efficacious statutory appeal against the assessment order was available, and the petitioner had not pursued it. The Court therefore declined to examine the merits in writ jurisdiction and directed the petitioner to avail the appellate remedy. The principle applied is that writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be used to bypass a statutory appeal where the controversy turns on disputed facts. en-us Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Apr 2018 13:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186225 A writ petition challenging an assessment order was not entertained because the dispute hinged on factual questions about alleged non-service or fabrication of the notice for appearance, which were not suitable for writ adjudication. An efficacious statutory appeal against the assessment order was available, and the petitioner had not pursued it. The Court therefore declined to examine the merits in writ jurisdiction and directed the petitioner to avail the appellate remedy. The principle applied is that writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be used to bypass a statutory appeal where the controversy turns on disputed facts. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186225