<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1566 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186217</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the respondent&#039;s order denying the petitioner&#039;s request for cross-examination of officers and a co-noticee in a Customs Act case. The Court found the reasons provided by the respondent to be valid and concluded that there was no illegality justifying interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. As a result, the writ petition challenging the order was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 10:32:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1566 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186217</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the respondent&#039;s order denying the petitioner&#039;s request for cross-examination of officers and a co-noticee in a Customs Act case. The Court found the reasons provided by the respondent to be valid and concluded that there was no illegality justifying interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. As a result, the writ petition challenging the order was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>