<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1567 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186218</link>
    <description>The High Court condoned a delay in re-filing the appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance of payment under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2008-09. The Court found no substantial question of law and upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, stating that the facts and legal arguments did not warrant a different outcome from a previous case with similar circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 10:32:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1567 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186218</link>
      <description>The High Court condoned a delay in re-filing the appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance of payment under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2008-09. The Court found no substantial question of law and upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, stating that the facts and legal arguments did not warrant a different outcome from a previous case with similar circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>