<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 364 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332103</link>
    <description>A full disallowance of input credit was not sustainable where the show cause notice and corrigendum did not clearly quantify the alleged irregularity invoice-wise or entry-wise, and the record did not establish that the entire credit was taken without receipt of inputs or on a complete factual foundation. Only the admitted inadmissible credit remained disallowable. Penalty also could not be enhanced in remand proceedings beyond the penalty fixed in the earlier adjudication that had not been challenged, so a reduced penalty was considered appropriate and was brought down to Rs. 1,00,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 364 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332103</link>
      <description>A full disallowance of input credit was not sustainable where the show cause notice and corrigendum did not clearly quantify the alleged irregularity invoice-wise or entry-wise, and the record did not establish that the entire credit was taken without receipt of inputs or on a complete factual foundation. Only the admitted inadmissible credit remained disallowable. Penalty also could not be enhanced in remand proceedings beyond the penalty fixed in the earlier adjudication that had not been challenged, so a reduced penalty was considered appropriate and was brought down to Rs. 1,00,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>