<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 362 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of CENVAT Credit due to lack of evidence but directed the Adjudicating authority to reconsider the penalty imposition by offering the Appellants the option to pay 25% of the penalty as per the statutory provisions and relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 362 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of CENVAT Credit due to lack of evidence but directed the Adjudicating authority to reconsider the penalty imposition by offering the Appellants the option to pay 25% of the penalty as per the statutory provisions and relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>