<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4725</link>
    <description>Interim stay of further proceedings pursuant to a remand order was sought pending disposal of an appeal, but the appeal&#039;s maintainability itself was under challenge. In that setting, the Court held that no interim protection could be granted at that stage. The request for stay was therefore refused, and the miscellaneous petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4725</link>
      <description>Interim stay of further proceedings pursuant to a remand order was sought pending disposal of an appeal, but the appeal&#039;s maintainability itself was under challenge. In that setting, the Court held that no interim protection could be granted at that stage. The request for stay was therefore refused, and the miscellaneous petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>