https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4724 The Tribunal dismissed the party's appeal, upholding the demand for service tax and penalties. The party's claim of denial of natural justice was rejected, citing lack of evidence of intent to evade payment. The Tribunal found the demand for service tax was not time-barred, despite confusion over tax liability. The request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was partially granted, with a specific amount to be deposited. The challenge to the remand order was acknowledged but not stayed. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the party's plea of limitation under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. en-us Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4724 The Tribunal dismissed the party's appeal, upholding the demand for service tax and penalties. The party's claim of denial of natural justice was rejected, citing lack of evidence of intent to evade payment. The Tribunal found the demand for service tax was not time-barred, despite confusion over tax liability. The request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was partially granted, with a specific amount to be deposited. The challenge to the remand order was acknowledged but not stayed. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the party's plea of limitation under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4724