<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 338 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332077</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the Assessing Officer did not independently believe that income had escaped assessment and acted under compulsion from the audit party. Therefore, the reopening of the assessment was deemed invalid. The court set aside the notice dated 12.03.2015, ruling in favor of the petitioner and disposing of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 338 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332077</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the Assessing Officer did not independently believe that income had escaped assessment and acted under compulsion from the audit party. Therefore, the reopening of the assessment was deemed invalid. The court set aside the notice dated 12.03.2015, ruling in favor of the petitioner and disposing of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>